FCC Invites Comment on Cost Reimbursements for C-Band Satellite Rebranding Expenses

By |2020-06-09T12:23:44-05:00June 9th, 2020|Legal News|

As is well known, the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) has decided to truncate the C-band satellite downlink band (3.7-4.2 GHz) from a bandwidth of 500 MHz to 200 MHz, with the other 300 MHz to be auctioned for terrestrial wireless services. Earth station (satellite dish) operators who have licensed or registered their dishes will be...… Continue Reading

Looking at the President’s Executive Order on Online Media – Part 2, What Real Risk Does It Pose for Media Companies?

By |2020-06-05T11:24:46-05:00June 5th, 2020|Legal News|

We summarized the provisions of Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act on Monday, looking at the application of the law that the President has sought to change through the Executive Order released last week.  Today, it’s time to look at what the Executive Order purports to do and what practical effects it might have... Continue Reading…

Understanding the Minority Tax Certificate and its Potential for Promoting Diversity in Broadcast Ownership

By |2020-06-04T10:14:50-05:00June 4th, 2020|Legal News|

An intense national conversation on racial justice and equity has been thrust upon the country by the events of the last week.  While our focus here on this blog is narrow, it is certainly worth looking at some of the issues that are within our broadcast world that are relevant to this conversation.  In recent... Continue Reading…

LPTV and TV Translators – Settlement Window for Mutually Exclusive Applications and Reminder on Deadline for Vacating Certain Channels

By |2020-06-02T11:18:12-05:00June 2nd, 2020|Legal News|

LPTV and TV translator licensees and applicants saw two notices from the FCC yesterday dealing with fall-out from the FCC’s incentive auction and the subsequent repacking of TV stations into a smaller part of the broadcast spectrum.  The first notice announced a settlement window that runs through July 31 for applicants for new or modified... Continue Reading…

The President’s Executive Order on Online Media – What Does Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act Provide?

By |2020-06-01T11:00:21-05:00June 1st, 2020|Legal News|

When the President issues an Executive Order asking for examination of Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which permitted the growth of so many Internet companies, broadcasters and other media companies ask what effect the action may have on their operations.  On an initial reading, the impact of the order is very uncertain, as... Continue Reading…

The President’s Executive Order on Online Media – What Does Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act Provide?

By |2020-06-01T11:00:21-05:00June 1st, 2020|Legal News|

When the President issues an Executive Order asking for examination of Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which permitted the growth of so many Internet companies, broadcasters and other media companies ask what effect the action may have on their operations.  On an initial reading, the impact of the order is very uncertain, as... Continue Reading…

This Week at the FCC for Broadcasters: May 23, 2020 to May 29, 2020

By |2020-05-31T09:35:17-05:00May 31st, 2020|Legal News|

Here are some of the regulatory and legal actions of the last week—and some obligations for the week ahead—of significance to broadcasters, with links to where you can go to find more information as to how these actions may affect your operations. The comment cycle was set in the FCC’s annual regulatory fee proceeding. On... Continue Reading…

FCC Enforcement Monitor ~ May 2020

By |2020-05-28T14:14:04-05:00May 28th, 2020|Legal News|

Pillsbury’s communications lawyers have published FCC Enforcement Monitor monthly since 1999 to inform our clients of notable FCC enforcement actions against FCC license holders and others.  This month’s issue includes: Wireless Internet Provider Hit With $25,000 Proposed Fine for Interference Caused by Network Equipment Unauthorized License Transfers Lead to Consent Decree and $70,000 Civil Penalty […]

Go to Top